Ficus maclellandii 'Alii'

Pretty, Delonix! Surprisingly thin trunk for a Ficus, though.

Tugbrethil:

Yes, it does have quite a small trunk. This tree has grown pretty slowly. I've seen others in San Diego which have grown faster and have larger trunks at the same size as the one above.

When I see trees in the parks doing this, I almost always find the base girdled by a weed whacker.

As you say, it's a terrific spcimen.

Tugbrethil:

This tree has a large mulch perimeter around the trunk. I think it just needs more water...like so many of our park trees.

Rbtkew:

It's the perfect size tree for a medium-sized yard...as most Ficus trees become humongous trees here. The tree to the left in background of the palms is a 50ft/16m tall Ficus lyrata - Fiddle Leaf Fig.

I can't blame them for trying to save water, Delonix, but they are probably no smarter about it than the Parks Dept. in Glendale, AZ. Every year they run the drip system on the Xeriscape Botanical Garden every day for a few minutes--except for the middle of summer, when they cut the water off completely, "to save water"! I've always been amazed at how many of the plants survive that abuse, but, predictably, not too many actually look good.

Thats a touchy Ficus even for Los Angeles. They say that the tree's can do well for years,then rot in a rainy winter.

I think this one would grow in the Bay Area (protected area). It's pretty tough, actually. The one I really like (which is more tender) is Ficus maclellandii 'Amstel King' it looks similar; however, has much large leaves. It's become quite popular here in San Diego.

The reason why it's probably rotting is because it's not receiving enough water throughout the year. It loves water.

Wow that is big I would nt be able to get it out my house lol looks grest though and shape.

It's much larger now. This photo was taken 6 years ago.

Yes, it's a very ornamental tree. :>))

Yes I bet it is a lot bigger now Andy thank you for showing me .

You're welcome. :>))

☺